Q:
If I cannot afford to pay salaries as
a result of declining revenue because of government restrictions on the
operation of my business due to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
pandemic, should I retrench my employees?
If you absolutely cannot afford to
continue paying employees, I would not recommend a retrenchment if your
intention is to temporarily suspend operations until restrictions are lifted.
I’ll begin with my recommendation of
a “temporary layoff” and support it with a quote by one of the most respected past
presidents of the Industrial Court - His Honour Mr. Addison Masefield Khan - from
page 5 of a 1991 TIWU v Consolidated Appliances Limited judgement:
“The practice of a temporary lay-off is well
recognised in industrial relations practice. A temporary layoff is a remedy
which may be utilised by an employer to obtain relief where circumstances
beyond his control warrant its implementation. It is a right which an employer
may use only when the circumstances demand it. It must not be abused or be as a
result of a whimsical decision. It must be required by the circumstances, which
must be beyond the control of the employer and not of his own making.”
Most importantly for an employer
suffering from significantly reduced revenue, with a “temporary layoff” there
is no legal obligation for an employer to pay employees during the period,
however, with retrenchment, severance payments must made to retrenched
employees within a certain period.
In addition to that and a few other reasons, I would not recommend retrenchment mainly because it is
governed by the Retrenchment and Severance Benefits Act 1985, which
means that there are strict legal obligations that must be followed. For
example:
Section 4(1) – if five
(5) or more employees are being retrenched, each employee, the Minister of
Labour and the recognised majority union (if there is one) must be given written notice that includes:
·
Names
and position
·
Length
of service and current salary
·
Reasons
for redundancy
·
Proposed
date of termination
·
Criteria
used for selection of workers to be retrenched
Section 6 - minimum 45
days’ notice (only for 5 or more)… or payment in lieu of the notice period.
Section 18(3) –
employees must be paid for their years of service.
- Employees paid daily, weekly & fortnightly must be paid two (2) weeks’ wages per year for 1 - 4 years’ service and then three (3) weeks’ wages per year for service of 5 years and more
- Employees paid monthly must receive 1/2 month’s salary per year for 1 – 4 years’ service and then 3/4 month’s salary per year for service of 5 years and over
Section 22 - stipulates that severance payments must be made no later than thirty (30) days after the last day of the notice period mentioned in section 6.
Section
25(1)(a) - A person who contravenes the provisions of this Act is guilty of an
industrial relations offence within the meaning of the Industrial Relations Act
and liable—
(a)
in the case of an employer, to a fine of ten thousand dollars;
Now that you have all the information, the choice is
yours.
What are your legal rights if your employer decides to pay you quarter of your monthly salary during this time and then suggests you work at that pay or go home and then they will pay you severance in years to come because the do not have the money to pay you at this time?
ReplyDeleteAs an employee, you are always free to pursue your grievances through a trade union.
Delete